Occupy NH Divides Over…?

by Garret Ean
July 17 2012

The first meeting of ONH, Arms Park, Manchester. 6 Oct 2011

I have been waiting to publish information regarding the status of Occupy New Hampshire as of the general assembly held on the state house lawn on July 15, 2012. Before I arrived at the scene, a clear division had formed and meetings were occurring between two separate camps. I noticed many familiar faces at the camp closest to where I had parked and began walking toward them with my camera rolling. Hearing what appeared by all indicators to be a productive discussion in progress, I set the camera down and tried to see who I could recognize in the farther crowd. Seeing both friends and strangers, I saw others in the movement whom I considered to be more failed politicians than impassioned grassroots organizers. Among the many who have come and gone over the span of ONH since its first GA on October 6, 2012, my observation would only place two or three individuals in this category. In all popular power struggles, it is these individuals who act upon opportunity to declare themselves the vanguard. Vanguardism in popular movements is dangerous in that it offers the revolutionary a sense of entitlement over the masses as had existed for the class which had been overthrown. If there comes to be a conflict over who truly represents the Occupy movement in New Hampshire, may we listen most cautiously to the loudest voices.

The individuals who seceded from the general assembly without engaging in any sort of consensus process are reportedly trying to retain the Occupy New Hampshire name by unknown means. There has been discussion of possible lawsuits pending against members of the group who did not participate in the ostracism campaign and secede from the main group. While I am still gathering information about what happened on Sunday and its consequences, information continues to be released by different parties. My raw footage from the inclusive circle (which welcomed all individuals) will be online by the end of the week. The seceding circle’s meeting was recorded through written notes and some still photography, but it is believed that no video exists. The meeting minutes, as taken by Katie Talbert, are the most complete public record of what occurred on the other side of the park.


Meanwhile, here’s a perspective from Rich Angell, a newcomer to the Occupy movement who describes himself as a periphery supporter from the beginning. Rich is from a more rural area of the state than most and has been involved with sustainable intentional communities since moving to New Hampshire for the Free State Project in 2007. He recalls the unwelcome reception that some gave him when he arrived.

Some accounts of the event with false information have been released, and there will be links to valid sources of information as well as corrections included in the post released with the full video.



About freeconcord

Viva Liberty
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Occupy NH Divides Over…?

  1. Pingback: Occupy NH Divides Over…? | GrassrootsHeadlines.com

  2. Like one of the ladies said in the YouTube video, FreeState blew it for Occupy NH. I will never participate in a group that totes around guns like they are soldiers. I do believe in a strong political NH though. Words and actions are much more powerful than weapons. I would like to be part of a weapons-free Occupy Movement, but I’m not willing to go to jail just to make a point about how legal it is to carry a gun. If people want to go around defending guns, go ahead, but the Occupy movement is much more than that.
    As a society, we have put so much emphasis on gun rights that we have forgotten about the rights of a free society to be able to walk down the street and not have to worry about getting shot. Are you people keeping track of the statistics? In a year, US deaths around 9k whereas Australia about 35 people. C’mon now, it doesn’t take a dead patriot like Paul Revere to tell you those numbers have to come down.
    This is New Hampshire and I know everyone thinks their special. Yes, we’re special alright, in that we have a pretty good record when it comes to violent crime compared to the rest of the country. Now let’s keep it that way and work on the issues. The issues are not defending someone that wants to walk around NH slinging a rifle. That is not our job. Our job is a political and economic one, one that requires us to be consistent, and on guard mentally.
    Do you realize what is at risk?
    The NRA is a terrorist organization and I wouldn’t be surprised if they support the NH gun-toters. Occupy NH has no choice but to distinguish itself from the NRA and any other group that chooses to support terrorist activities–because that’s what they are. Now I’m not saying what happened in Chicago is true. I think it was a set up but FreeState stuck their nose in it & the cops got back at them.
    Don’t drag us into this, we don’t want to deal with the gun issue unless you are talking about creating a national database to manage ammunition, or declaring the NRA a terrorist organization.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s